Apr 30

The second question I asked on LinkedIn was to do with Apple TV, which I’ve blogged about a bit here recently as I got one on a trip to Canada.

This question got significantly less attention that the one on Twitter,
at only 4 answers as opposed to 15, but the answers were much more
involved and detailed.  As before, I’ve edited them slightly here, and
if you want to see the full version then please visit the page on
linkedin
.

Question: Is Apple.TV going to make a difference or have they got it wrong?  Everyone’s talking about IPTV and the change from broadcast to on-demand. With Apple.TV being perhaps one of the first to market, are we going to see big changes? What does it mean to you?

I do not fully understand the AppleTV concept. I am a MacAddict and have everything else. I transmit my iTunes from the computer to the stereo by way of an AirPort Express. I was given the first generation of iPod by my wife and at first did not see the value of that either.
Steve may not have a home run with AppleTV yet, but you can bet your bottom dollar that this is the direction of things to come.
Lloyd Showalter, Industrial electrician at Alcoa Flexible Packaging LLC

AppleTV is not an IPTV product in its current form. It will only stream content from a PC or Mac running iTunes and allow the user to transfer video from iTunes to the AppleTV hard disk drive to play from there. The device does not allow you to play video or audio content directly from the Internet and thus should not be categorised as an IPTV or WebTV set-top box. It would be more accurate to call it a HD-capable media extender, especially considering its dependency on a computer running iTunes.

AppleTV essentially provides a TV with Video iPod-like functionality with the ability to playback HD content at 720p resolution, and it complements the current crop of Apple hardware. However, the current limitations of the hardware (only 33GB HDD space available to the user, standard definition televisions not supported, no AV cables supplied, no support for Dolby surround) and software (cannot purchase content at the iTunes store directly from the device) make this a weak play into the video hardware market. To make matters worse, there is a distinct lack of HD content available on iTunes at the present time, and what video content is available does not make for enjoyable viewing on a large TV display.

Apple’s strong brand and loyal consumers will no doubt shift a reasonable number of units, but the lack of iTunes store integration in particular makes this a missed opportunity for Apple to become a major player in the IPTV/WebTV market. This could, of course, change with later revisions of AppleTV software and hardware, but until then AppleTV is unlikely to make significant waves in the industry.
Matt Taylor, DTV/IPTV Development Consultant

I think their biggest problem is the competition; the box is 300$ and then there are the costs of the content. The price point (for TV programming) it is competing against is 0$, just a broadband connection needed. For instance look at Joost, just a broadband connection needed.

Don’t confuse this with the things that made the iPod successful. That was a great product at the right time and a realistic price. Plus the iPod can play ordinary, non-DRM mp3 files. So people could leverage their existing collections, and their friends music collections, and content (not all illegal!) downloaded from the internet.  This does not play Div-X, the video equivalent of mp3.
Owen Carter, Software development tools specialist and Unix admin

IPTV is getting a lot of attention in the market place an has created a huge amount of revenue for conference organisers. However, having attended a few conferences, it is clear that this had been a strategy from Fixed Wire networks flogging DSL to counter the Cable companies moving into their ‘turf’, by adding telephony and broadband to cable TV. However, no-one has to date been fully successful with it. Free in France is often referred to as having been succesful, but the reality on the ground is that their IPTV service comes bundled for free with their broadband package, and it is not all happiness with the users that actually use it.

However, there is a growing move to WebTV, as distinct from IPTV which refers to traditional TV. Howard Eisner, ex Disney, ahve invested in Vunguru, a web video production company. There is a growing number of video production companies developing specific content for the Web.
Jeremy Nel, Consultant

I think the apple TV is going to be one we have to wait and see with, but from the point of view of everyone I’ve shown it’s a big hit and a lot of people say they’re going to get one.  The possibility of Apple releasing extra plugins for it, 3rd party plugins and upgrades, and Apple’s own brand extension devices, like a HD-DVD module, or external storage etc., mean it’s a small device that has the potential to be a massive change in the living room.

Howard

Apr 30

A few weeks ago I posted a couple of questions to LinkedIn Answers to see what kind of response I’d get and judge how other people we thinking about a things.  Once questions was on the AppleTV and the other was on Twitter.  The following is the collected answers I received.  I think they give an interesting insight into how people are working with these new technologies.

First up, Twitter.  I got a LOT of responses to this question, too many for this blog post to be honest, so I am going to edit them.  If you want to see the full list of answers visit the page on LinkedIn.

From the answers below it seems that there is quite a lot of negativity surrounding Twitter, certainly amongst the LinkedIn audience.

Question: Everyone is talking about Twitter! Are you using it, if so, why? Is it useful?

I don’t really "get" it myself. As in, I understand it, and I’ve had a play with it, but I find it really rather meaningless as anything I would want to implement in my life.
Thayer Driver, Commercial Director

I have stopped using it because currently for business purposes there is no way to make adequate disclosure that complies with WOMMA recommendations…
Andy Beard, Owner, Keedz Ltd

I’m using Twitter primarily as a micro-blogging platform.
Eden Spodek, Online Communications at Ontario Teacher’s Pension Plan

I don’t use it myself, but am fascinated by what people are using and why. ;-)
Jeremy Nal, Consultant

I enjoy it, but only as a portable, personal micro-blogging format. It is quite a distraction and find it hard to see it as anything but a novelty.
Johanna Hunt, Researcher at the University of Sussex

It works extremely well in a conference setting where you can keep track of the movements of friends and acquaintances – which panel people are attending, which parties to sign up for, where people are meeting for lunch etc.

it’s a little less useful the rest of the time but still fun to play around with.
Michael Smith, CEO/Founder of Mind Candy and Co-Founder of Firebox.com

Interesting to play with. Not sure if it’ll be useful in the long term yet.
Adrian Howard, Passionate about creating great software

Unfortunately, I think it’s a matter of time until spammers get a hold of it.
Chris Cavallari, Producer

I use it and enjoy it, but it’s not for everyone. You definitely don’t want to open up your twitter account to everybody or you’ll do nothing but spend time reading their twits.
Matthew Fitzsimmons

I find Twitter annoying.
Glen Farrelly, Website producer at Hospitals of Ontario

useless but seems to be fun and popular.
Fayyaz Alam, Manager of IT at Emirates Airlines

When it comes to stupid internet or gadget fads, this one absolutely takes the cake.  It is a useless indulgence in our online world.
David Cote, VP New Media, AgencyNext Inc.

My own personal thoughts on Twitter is that it’s a massive ego-stroking tool for people who already have a large blog audience.  The people with the most friends are those who are already “famous” and they’re attracting so called friend because others want that fame to rub off on them.

I’m no longer using twitter as I found it to be a waste of time more than anything and, for me, it doesn’t add anything to the mix that I can’t already get with using blogs or IM.

Howard

Apr 27

Apr 26
PromoStyl
icon1 howard | icon2 future | icon4 04 26th, 2007| icon3No Comments »

Promostyl_small_logo
The other day I attended a presentation from Matthew Jet of the trend spotting (I prefer Cool Hunting myself, makes it sound more like something a ninja would do, and Gibson uses it) agency Promostyl.

Promostyl generally work in the fashion arena, having a background in fashion since 1967, but more recently have been branching out to work with marketing agencies, as well as global companies like Nokia, Panasonic, Subaru and others.

Matthew came in to talk to us about some of the ways they spot trends, and some things he sees happening in the next year or so.

Apparently 2008 will continue to be a year of luxury for the consumer, with an eye on meaning and progress.  As we all know, luxury hasn’t done itself any favours recently and has become a bit too mainstream (Burberry baseball cap anyone?  Thought not!) , accessible and basically common, and over the next year or so he sees them trying to re-establish an arena of exclusivity, not through price, but through rarity. 

Apparently there will be four key drivers we will need to be aware of – style, outdoors, illusions and territories.

Style is focused around looking forward.  In 80’s luxury looked back into the past.  Now it’s about the future.  Human technology will be a key, and luxury itself will be linked to excellence in terms of user experience and technology within it.  Think Vertu phones made from F1 carbon fibre.  As technology becomes more complex, luxury technology will strive to become more simple.  He used the example of a washing machine.  1,000 settings on the dial – everyone only uses one.  What washing machines need to have is a single button on the front that says “wash clothes”. 

Outdoors is, as it sounds, linked to the outdoor environment.  Think high-tech hiking boots and posh camping equipment.  Nomadic lifestyles for the masses.  Freedom to move but within an environment that reflects as closely as possible the luxury lifestyle we all have in our homes.  Big focus on moving the inside outside. 

Illusions refers to the collapse of the real into the virtual.  Drawing attention to natural animal and organic design into real world places.  Post-minimalism.  Matthew used an example of a shop interior designed to look like the inside of a human body.

Finally, territories is a discovery of the roots of society.  A return to old ways, ethnic influences and identifying meaning and value in who we are and what we do.  Think about obtaining a sense of modernity through the use of old techniques and older resources.  Using tried and trusted ethnic and nomadic methods in a new context.

I’m sure I’ve not fully done Matthew’s excellent presentation justice here, but if you want to know more I suggest you get in touch with them.

Howard

Apr 21
links for 2007-04-21
icon1 howard | icon2 links | icon4 04 21st, 2007| icon3No Comments »
Apr 19
links for 2007-04-19
icon1 howard | icon2 links | icon4 04 19th, 2007| icon3No Comments »
Apr 18

One of the things I come across often in my job is having to explain to people who aren’t completely familiar or comfortable with "digital marketing" that it’s way more than just web sites and emails.

A lot of the time, when you say something like "it could be a web site, or it could be a whole lot more" it simply confuses people and makes them even more cautious around the medium.

The problem is there is simply so much out there making up the "Digital Ecosystem".

To help illustrate this we’ve begun to use this diagram to show all of the possible iterations that can and often do happen in an integrated digital campaign.  This isn’t an exhaustive list by any means, but it gets the point across whilst helping to educate people to all of the different possibilities.

Note, this diagram is almost intentionally confusing and scary!

Howard

Digital_ecosystem_howard_2

Apr 18
links for 2007-04-18
icon1 howard | icon2 links | icon4 04 18th, 2007| icon3No Comments »
Apr 17

OK – so this isn’t much to do with digital marketing, but hey – it’s digital and it’s bound to have adverts on it eventually.  But, for now, let me geek out a bit more on the Apple TV…

Looks like the Apple TV could become more than a simple standalone iPod for telly device than it really is right now.

This post over at ArsTechnica, hints at some patents Apple has applied for in relation to a modular media centre design.

So, if the Apple TV is more than that, and from all the hacks around it really seems like it is, then what could we expect to be plugged into the apparently redundant USB port on the back of the machine?  let’s think….

Blueray Player?
HD-DVD player?
TV PVR tuner/recorder?
Stackable external HDD?
Home server functionality?
iSight module?
Memory card reader?
HD Radio?
Satellite Radio?

All of the above?

Howard

Apr 17

Big_idea

« Previous Entries