<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Don&#8217;t call it technical</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.adventuresdm.co.uk/archives/2007/11/dont-call-it-te.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.adventuresdm.co.uk/archives/2007/11/dont-call-it-te.html</link>
	<description>some Thoughts about digital marketing and online advertising</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Apr 2010 07:15:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: tim buesing</title>
		<link>http://www.adventuresdm.co.uk/archives/2007/11/dont-call-it-te.html/comment-page-1#comment-102</link>
		<dc:creator>tim buesing</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2007 04:40:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.adventuresdm.co.uk/wp/?p=394#comment-102</guid>
		<description>HOward, thanks for this post which made me chuckle in recognition. Wouldn&#039;t you think though that part of this phenomenon is our very presence in these meetings? What I mean is, if a meeting supposedly needs a digital expert, doesn&#039;t that insinuate that this stuff is separate, different and technical? Depending on our skills we sit next to the regular Creatives as well as the strategy/planner person, yet we are in a way responsible for a major production part as well.
I am myself ready to switch over to a single creative (digitally enhanced) role because frankly that &quot;Big Idea / Brand / funny TVC&quot; babble is a walk in the park compared to what I normally think about. I don&#039;t want to keep &quot;chipping in&quot; on other Creatives paper scribbles.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>HOward, thanks for this post which made me chuckle in recognition. Wouldn&#8217;t you think though that part of this phenomenon is our very presence in these meetings? What I mean is, if a meeting supposedly needs a digital expert, doesn&#8217;t that insinuate that this stuff is separate, different and technical? Depending on our skills we sit next to the regular Creatives as well as the strategy/planner person, yet we are in a way responsible for a major production part as well.<br />
I am myself ready to switch over to a single creative (digitally enhanced) role because frankly that &#8220;Big Idea / Brand / funny TVC&#8221; babble is a walk in the park compared to what I normally think about. I don&#8217;t want to keep &#8220;chipping in&#8221; on other Creatives paper scribbles.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Digital Recruiting</title>
		<link>http://www.adventuresdm.co.uk/archives/2007/11/dont-call-it-te.html/comment-page-1#comment-103</link>
		<dc:creator>Digital Recruiting</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2007 16:10:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.adventuresdm.co.uk/wp/?p=394#comment-103</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Sound Familiar?&lt;/strong&gt;

Interesting post here on the Adventures in Digital Marketing blog Not written about recruitment communications specifically but perhaps something a lot of people in the digital recruitment industry can empathise with!
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Sound Familiar?</strong></p>
<p>Interesting post here on the Adventures in Digital Marketing blog Not written about recruitment communications specifically but perhaps something a lot of people in the digital recruitment industry can empathise with!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
