I’ve been meaning to blog about outdoor digital advertising for some time now. It’s something I find very interesting, and over the past year or so as I’ve been walking to and from work here in London I’ve seen more and more screens popping up in public places.
I’ve been inspired to finally put some words down in a post from an article in the NYTimes which talks about a new form of digital billboard that’s popping up which features a built in camera for facial recognition. Apparently two companies are actively playing in this space, which they refer to as audience measurement systems, Quividi, a French company, and TruMedia, based in Israel and Holland. By placing small cameras into digital billboards (quite small ones judging by the image I saw about the size of a 32″ TV embedded into a larger billboard area) they both claim to be able to view the faces of people directly looking at the ad itself, and then using facial recognition, work out the sex, age and so forth of the audience. They don’t take a photo, apparently, just using it in real-time to work out what they want and then ditching the image.
It doesn’t take much to work out that this has got a lot of privacy people worked up, and in these cases I often sit very firmly on the fence as I am obviously both a professional in the digital space and a normal run of the mill consumer.
That aside, digital screens are beginning to pop up all over the place in London - and I can’t believe it’s not the same in other large urban spaces around the UK, Europe and the World.
The tube is the best example so far of digital advertising screens - there are simply hundreds of them appearing all the time (TFL claim they are in the process of installing 2000). Large runs of screens on escalators, to large poster sized screens at pretty much platform level. These screens feature animation, video and still images - often with multiple screens working together in some way.
But there are much larger screens appearing outside. Right by the London IMAX there is a really good example. A huge billboard is situated on the left of the Waterloo Bridge as you approach the IMAX. Unlike the tube screens, these large format outdoor screens are still image only. This is apparently because there still isn’t any research to prove that you won’t crash your car when an ad comes on.
There are even screens appearing on the stands that the Evening Standard newspaper sellers use - with what look like 32″ TV screens positioned clearly on the top of the stand.
Not to mention the sheer volume already of in-store digital screens that exist in the captive retail environment.
In the US there’s already an industry/trade body setup to work alongside providers of this new and rapidly growing area of digital marketing. I’m not yet aware of one in the UK, perhaps it falls under the domain of someone like BIMA or the IAB?
Often a concern about these screens is that they take energy where a poster would not - but I wonder what the comparison is between digital distributing a poster/video/animation to 2000 screens over the internet, versus printing off 2000 large format posters, driving them around london and then pasting them up in place? Aside from the saving for advertisers themselves, and the benefit of being able to digital and centrally manage campaigns on huge scales, there’s got to be something in not having to cut down any more trees?
Like I said above, I’m not sure about the audience tracking part being right or wrong, but it’s obvious that digital is gradually starting to take over all of the areas that traditional marketing has had it’s foot on for all this time. TV’s slowly going to the dark side, the likes of iPlayer and the soon to arrive “project Kangaroo” are making sure of that, and now posters and outdoor begin to make the move as well. Is nothing safe from our grubby binary hands?
Howard
image by James Cridland and found on Flickr